Press Regulation in the UK Nowadays: The Guardian about IPSO and IMPRESS

According to research different countries have unique experiences in solving ethical conflicts. The current study characterized the situation of media regulation UK as a crisis, since two similar regulators function instead one single national body. Independent Press Standards Organization (IPSO) oversees most newspapers, while Monitor for (IMPRESS) deals with local and regional publications. analysis Guardian`s articles from 2014 2021 on showed that after Complaints Commission was closed Guardian didn`t accept IPSO`s protection worked out its own self-regulatory scheme. journalists perceive IPSO repeats PCC`s mistake is far being an independent regulator. found not sufficiently resolute consistent upholding standards when it comes major British refused jurisdiction Recognition Panel (PRP) controls if meet certain requirements (39 Criteria). main advantage IMPRESS still exists basis grants voluntary contributions. It financially dependent industry has received approval PRP. mostly papers so no big influence scale. few cases activities “The Guardian”. Technologies pose new regulatory issues. A strict system internal some publications interesting example this sphere. Guardian” 20 years experience such work.